Common Reasons Platforms Reject IP Reports (And Fixes)
January 14, 2026 · Shieldify IP Policy Desk · 1 min read
Even experienced teams face rejection cycles. Most are preventable with tighter process controls.
Reason 1: Wrong claim category#
Trademark, copyright, and impersonation are often routed differently.
Reason 2: Weak ownership linkage#
The report must clearly connect the submitter to the rights owner.
Reason 3: Unstructured evidence#
If evidence is not URL-specific, reviewers may not confirm the violation quickly.
{
"reportQualityChecks": {
"claimCategoryConfirmed": true,
"ownershipLinked": true,
"urlLevelEvidence": true,
"submissionLogCreated": true
}
}Practical fixes#
Add pre-submission checks#
Use a checklist gate before submission to reduce avoidable rejections.
Standardize templates#
A consistent template for claim language improves reviewer readability.
Do not over-claim
Avoid broad language such as "all listings are fake" without specific supporting evidence.
FAQ#
Should we resubmit immediately after rejection?#
Only after identifying the rejection reason and correcting supporting materials.
Is one global template enough for all platforms?#
No. Use a core template, then adapt fields to each platform's required policy format.
Can acceptance rates improve quickly?#
Yes, when teams enforce pre-submission quality controls and clear ownership references.